
Affiliate Lite

OVERVIEW
Role
Timeline
Design and testing - 6 months
Development - 12 sprints with a 2022 release
UI designer partnered with a UX architect on this project. I participated in research and design, as well as advising on best design practices.
Tools
Team
Sketch
Miro
2 Product Designers
Product Manager
6 Developers
OPPORTUNITY
Can we create a simplified tool for affiliates who don’t do much work for us without expending man hours explaining our systems.
We found that SMS Assist’s systems were complicated for the users. They had been designed and built under the assumption that users (Affiliates) were working with us all the time and any gaps could be trained or learned over time. However we realized that covers only 80% of our work orders. The other 20% were users who don’t do much work for us, thus found our tools a hassle.
OUTCOME
Higher adoption & timely invoices increased revenue in the residential business vertical of $400k, while the commercial gained $500k
Affiliate Lite now allowed affiliates to enter invoices directly, preventing invoices to be misplaced, which helped Operations. We ended up having a 100% compliance from Emergency-Sourced Affiliates when entering these invoicing data. We went from 0 compliances for invoice creation to 100%. Furthermore, 6 months after launch we saw an increase in adoption rate from our neglected vendors in remote areas. Before Affiliate Lite 12% of work orders were accepted in time, now it’s 96%. Finally, we saw an increase from 20% to 70% of work orders invoiced in time.
THE USER
Our product wanted to focus on the Emergency-Sourced Affiliates, who accounted for 20% of our work orders.
We have 3 different types of Affiliates:
Emergency Sourced Affiliates: Affiliates that don’t receive many work orders from SMS. These are one-offs, with no existing relationships, thus no time for training.
Low Volume Affiliates: These affiliates receive a few work orders per year.
Major National Companies: These are big companies that would rarely use SMS’s services.
DESIGN PROCESS
DISCOVERY
We had to identify the minimum business requirements. We didn’t want the affiliates to do anything unnecessary. We had to ask ourselves “What’s the minimum amount of info we can get on a WO that would work for operations”. So we specifically talked to vendors who didn’t have a relationship with SMS or our systems. To better understand what would make sense to them intuitively. We asked them what they would do if there was no system. What information would they send? What verbiage they used. We had to differentiate SMS jargon and industry terms. This information allowed us to come up with a workflow and design.

We then focused on the onboarding. We identified the one-off emergency vendors we needed to work for us. And we needed to make it easy to add these emergency affiliates to our system and dispatch them. Utilizing our new “Affiliate Lite” process and not the standard process.
The last part of discovery involved us learning that we had created a process for affiliates to agree to terms and conditions, but the workaround the “Emergency Team” was using by-passed these terms and conditions. So before this product, emergency vendors didn’t have as much legal protection. So part of our goal was to provide more legal protection.
WIREFRAMES

FINAL DESIGN
After creating hi-fidelity designs we went through multiple rounds of testing to ensure the core requirements of the wireframes translated. And that both web and mobile designs were user friendly.

User first receives all the details of the work order and can decide to accept the job or decline.

After accepting the work order, the user can set their schedule and share the work order with their technician. Work order details are always present on the right side.

User can manage all other work orders they may be working on by expanding the ‘Manage work orders’ card.

User can access other ongoing work orders.

If the user needs to contact SMS they can do so by opening the ‘Communications’ card and start chatting with an SMS representative.

User can add photos to show the work done for this work order. And submit proposal if they need a higher budget for this work order.

If the user needs a higher budget to complete this work order they can submit a proposal.

Instead of leaving the flow to submit their own invoice, the user can submit one here after they complete the work order.

A final check-list for the user before completing the work order.










User can choose to accept or decline the work order. Upon acceptance they can set their schedule and review work details if necessary.

At any point the user can manage other work orders and communicate with SMS.

When the user starts the work order they can check-in.

The user will need to provide proof of service, so they can take photos of their work to send to SMS.

If the user needs a higher budget to complete this work order they can create a proposal to send to SMS.

Finally, the user can complete the work order that day or need a ‘Return trip‘. Afterwards they can create an invoice and go through a final checklist.





